Keap vs Fluent CRM
Hyperise integrates with 100's of sales and marketing tools, many of which are in the CRM category. With so many to choose from it's sometimes hard to know which is best, but don't worry, we've got your covered.
In this comparison guide we're going to look at the Highlights, Pros, Cons and Pricing of Keap and Fluent CRM. We'll also delve into the details of which offers the best personalization options within CRM, with there respective Hyperise integrations
Keap
Pricing: Keap (formerly Infusionsoft) has four tiered pricing plans that start at $99 per month. The pricing plans are divided into contact tiers. Keap also offers add-on services such as email marketing and payment processing that customers can purchase separately.
Vs
Fluent CRM
Pricing: FluentCRM offers a range of pricing packages, depending on the specific needs of each customer. Packages start at $29/month for the Basic plan and go up to $600/month for the Premium plan. All plans include unlimited users, unlimited emails, unlimited contacts and unlimited storage space. Some of the add-on features offered in the higher-priced plans include advanced segmentation, A/B testing, advanced reporting and automation.
Keap vs Fluent CRM Highlights
Keap is a customer relationship management (CRM) platform that is focused on helping small businesses automate tasks, keep track of customer information, and generate more revenue. It also provides marketing automation tools like automated emails, Drip campaigns, and landing pages. Fluent CRM on the other hand is a more comprehensive CRM system with added features like sales automation, marketing automation, customer segmentation, and more. Keap is generally used by small businesses that need a more basic solution with fewer features, while Fluent CRM is used by larger businesses looking for a more robust solution with more capabilities. Both Keap and Fluent CRM offer online payment integration, but Fluent CRM offers more advanced features like custom data field creation, project tracking, and invoice management. Fluent CRM also offers integration with other applications like Google Workspace and project management tools. Furthermore, Fluent CRM offers built-in analytics to measure performance and better understand customer behavior.
Keap vs Fluent CRM Pros
Keap Pros
- Simplified User Interface: Keap has a simpler and intuitive user interface compared to Fluent CRM, making it easier to navigate and use.
- Automation: With Keap, businesses can take advantage of comprehensive automation features to streamline their customer service and sales.
- Integrations: Keap has several pre-built integrations and plugins that allow businesses to extend their marketing and customer service processes.
- Support: Keap offers customer support via phone, chat, and email for their clients.
- Customizability: Keap allows for greater customizability than Fluent CRM, allowing businesses to create a customer experience that is tailored to their specific needs.
Fluent CRM Pros
- Fluent CRM
- Highly affordable offers plans from free to $1999/month
- Easy to use with a user-friendly interface
- Automation capabilities allows for customizable workflows and automatic behaviors
- Advanced tagging and segmentation for smarter customer segmentation
- Multiple insights options helps quickly spot customer trends
- Integrations with popular applications currently supports Zapier, Customerly, Shopify & more
- Affordable add-on options to extend functionality
- Offers powerful multi-channel support via email, SMS, in-app & web notifications
- Very helpful customer support team quick to respond and offer solutions
Keap vs Fluent CRM Cons
Keap Cons
- Limited customization options for forms and user flows
- Lack of multi-lingual support
- Limited automation capabilities
- Costlier than Fluent CRM
- Limited third-party integrations
- No native analytics dashboard
- Low-quality customer service
Fluent CRM Cons
- Fluent CRM is a fairly new CRM product and lacks the capabilities and features of more established systems such as Keap.
- Fluent CRM is not designed for managing complex customer relationships, does not provide an integrated e-commerce capabilities, and does not offer a mobile app.
- Fluent CRM lacks the reporting and analytics capabilities of Keap, and does not allow for automated sales tracking, or automation of various marketing tasks.
- Fluent CRM does not offer the same range of integrations as Keap, making it difficult to use with other business applications and services.
- Fluent CRM's customer service and support services are relatively limited when compared to more established CRMs like Keap.
Keap & Fluent CRM Hyperise Integrations
Keap uses the Image embed method to integrate with Hyperise, giving a simple way to add personalized images to your messages.
Keap makes the following data points available to Hyperise, to enable personalization in images used in outreach and linked out to your personalized website landing pages.
- Using business Email passed from Keap, Hyperise is able to enrich business logo and website screenshots. In some cases, with a business Email we're also able to enrich profile images, subject to the business email having a publicly available profile.
- Using business Website passed from Keap, Hyperise is able to enrich business logo and website screenshots.
- Business name
- Job title
- Street
- Street2
- City
- Country
- State
- Zip
Keap Integration Guide
Fluent CRM uses the Image embed method to integrate with Hyperise, giving a simple way to add personalized images to your messages.
Fluent CRM makes the following data points available to Hyperise, to enable personalization in images used in outreach and linked out to your personalized website landing pages.
- Using business Email passed from Fluent CRM, Hyperise is able to enrich business logo and website screenshots. In some cases, with a business Email we're also able to enrich profile images, subject to the business email having a publicly available profile.
- Street
- Street2
- City
Fluent CRM Integration Guide
vs 
vs 
vs 
vs 
vs 
vs 
vs 
vs 
vs 
vs 
vs 
vs 
vs 
vs 
